Results for 30Boxes

Web 2.0 Service
Test Average: 58%
Reviewed 27 August 2009

Description

Online calendar. Sends reminders and has a to-do list. This calendar can also be used to render calendar files in a webpage and allows for sharing and collaboration with friends.

Accessibility Testing Results

The actual calendar is not keyboard accessible and pop up windows appear as overlays when items are completed or entered. It is very easy to use but not screen reader accessible as events and other items become displaced with linearisation. The layout is clear in graphical mode and just clicking on icons and dates allows for changes to be made. Zooming is good and levels of colour contrast depend on personal choices - certain aspects can be changed with browser settings but not text on the calendar.

# Test Score Summary
1Login, Signup and Other Forms Accessible Fair There are no labels for forms within this product - this may create problems with some screenreaders.
2Image ALT Attributes Fair Some apparently critical images appear to be missing alt tags and so items are missed by screen reader users.
3Link Target Definitions Good Some non-critical links may seem ambiguous.
4Frame Titles and Layout Excellent No frames or iframes, which can be disorientating for screen-readers, are used in the design.
5Removal of Stylesheet Poor The site is unusable without the stylesheet.
6Audio/Video Features Excellent N/A - This site does not deal with multimedia content.
7Video/animations - audio descriptions Excellent N/A - This site does not deal with multimedia content.
8Appropriate use of Tables Poor Tables are used to construct this site - this may cause some screenreaders to read the content in the wrong order.
9Tab Orderings Correct and Logical Excellent Tab order is in a logical and consistent top-to-bottom or left-to-right format.
10Page Functionality with Keyboard Poor This site requires the use of a pointing device due to the nature of its JavaScript buttons.
11Accessibility of Text Editors Poor Text editor is not accessible with the screenreader or keyboard.
12Appropriate Feedback with Forms Excellent The product provides suitable feedback when the user performs an action.
13Contrast and Colour Check Good Some non-critical text fails extended validation, but the majority of text is fine.
14Page Integrity when Zooming Excellent The website maintains the layout and usability of all critical areas perfectly when zoomed.
15Text size, style, blinking elements and Readability Good The majority of text on the site is size ten, which is readable but may be uncomfortable for some.

Disability-Tailored Results

The following table shows how well the product performs for people with disabilities, as listed in the Disabilities section.

Percentages do not indicate how much of a site is accessible. They indicate the average figure of test results relevant to each disability. Select a disability to see which tests are relevant to it.

Disability Average Score
Deaf/Hard of Hearing89%
Colour Deficiencies78%
Visual Stress78%
Partially Sighted and Visual Acuity75%
Specific Learning Differences (including Dyslexia)67%
Cognitive Learning Disabilities61%
Blind and Severe Visual Impairments53%
Dexterity/Mobility33%

Activities you can do with 30Boxes