Results for PBworks (PBwiki)

Web 2.0 Service
Test Average: 56%
Reviewed 27 August 2009

Description

PBwiki has been renamed as PBworks and has lost its peanut butter sandwich logo. There is a free version and other options for commercial use. It enables people to collaborate on documents and host websites which are interactive. Once signed in you receive an e-mail and can set up your own pages using the templates provided. You can add calendars, stock charts, table of contents, a chat room, images and YouTube videos. There is also an add in for bubbleshare.

Accessibility Testing Results

The output from this wiki is good but sadly the editor used does not allow for keyboard access and is not screen reader accessible. A text browser does not even show a link for editing the main area. However for text to speech applications access is good and colours can be changed along with font sizes and types.

# Test Score Summary
1Login, Signup and Other Forms Accessible Good Forms lacked labels although some screen readers would be able to access the text boxes as they were in the correct order.
2Image ALT Attributes Good Many images are CSS backgrounds with supporting texts which means there are no problems in text browser and the screen reader will not even be aware of the images used.
3Link Target Definitions Excellent There were no problems with links
4Frame Titles and Layout Excellent No frames in place.
5Removal of Stylesheet Fair Problems exist because the site uses a table layout
6Audio/Video Features Fair This depends on the use of embedded YouTube video player and use of alt tags with added graphics etc
7Video/animations - audio descriptions Fair This depends on the use of embedded YouTube video player and use of audio descriptions within the original videos.
8Appropriate use of Tables Poor Tables are used for layout which is detrimental to linear navigation
9Tab Orderings Correct and Logical Excellent Tab order goes through the tables from top down and then across the page
10Page Functionality with Keyboard Fair Keyboard access was possible until you had to use the rich text editor when there was no way to reach the menus
11Accessibility of Text Editors Poor The rich text editor did not allow for keyboard only access. Javascript is used and the form cannot be seen in a text browser.
12Appropriate Feedback with Forms Poor The feedback was not helpful as it appeared in one sentence with a long list of possible errors
13Contrast and Colour Check Excellent There were no problems with the standard colours
14Page Integrity when Zooming Excellent Zooming was good on the basic site
15Text size, style, blinking elements and Readability Good This was good on the main site but some of the help files or tips were rather faint and small.

Disability-Tailored Results

The following table shows how well the product performs for people with disabilities, as listed in the Disabilities section.

Percentages do not indicate how much of a site is accessible. They indicate the average figure of test results relevant to each disability. Select a disability to see which tests are relevant to it.

Disability Average Score
Visual Stress89%
Colour Deficiencies67%
Partially Sighted and Visual Acuity67%
Specific Learning Differences (including Dyslexia)60%
Cognitive Learning Disabilities56%
Dexterity/Mobility50%
Blind and Severe Visual Impairments47%
Deaf/Hard of Hearing33%

Activities you can do with PBworks (PBwiki)