Results for diigo
Bookmarks websites and annotates them with stickynotes, highlights and comments. Bookmarks and annotations can be shared with other Diigo users. It is useful for research where quotes can be selected and commented upon as well as tagged for future use - helps organisation.
Accessibility Testing Results
The site is generally well designed with various options to login, but the accessible form depends on the service is used. The main issue is page functionality with keyboard access and at times it was easier to work in a text only view. The site is complex and allows you to see a website and use the videos etc whilst adding comments for your diigo library. Usability is an issue rather than accessibility on many pages.
|1||Login, Signup and Other Forms Accessible||Users can log in via Facebook, Twitter. Google and Yahoo, as well as the sites registration with supportive instructions but when verification occurred read by NVDA, keyboard exit from the pop up window did not seem possible. There is a Captcha but if a user is a member of the other sites this sign up may be easier.|
|2||Image ALT Attributes||Important images have alternative text and images for bullet points are correctly labelled.|
|3||Link Target Definitions||Links have titles to uniquely identify them.|
|4||Frame Titles and Layout||iframes are used for advertisements and sections of the website, but it is possible to navigate out of the iframe to the next section.|
|5||Removal of Stylesheet||The page is accessible without the stylesheet. In text only mode it appeared that there was better keyboard access.|
|6||Audio/Video Features||There is the chance to add text descriptions for the links stored. The information video does not have captioning|
|7||Video/animations - audio descriptions||There is the chance to add text descriptions at the comments. The information video does not have audio descriptions.|
|8||Appropriate use of Tables||Tables are not used in the design of the site.|
|9||Tab Orderings Correct and Logical||Tab ordering is correct and logical, in a top-to-bottom or left-to-right format.|
|10||Page Functionality with Keyboard||The main issue with this service is not so much the website but the bookmarklet called a Diigolet that is added to a toolbar so that you can build a library and share bookmarks etc. It is inaccessible via the keyboard once you are in a web page.|
|11||Accessibility of Text Editors||There is no rich text editor within this product. Edit fields such as search and explore groups do not have labels so may caused problems for screen reader users. The comment edit boxes tend to be separate from the bookmarked website when wishing to note items about a site.|
|12||Appropriate Feedback with Forms||The product provides suitable feedback when the user performs an action.|
|13||Contrast and Colour Check||Most contrast ratio are adequate, but some non-critical text has a poor luminosity contrast ratio.|
|14||Page Integrity when Zooming||The layout and readability of the site is unaffected by zooming. However, there is so much going on with some of the pages that it is hard to view all items.|
|15||Text size, style, blinking elements and Readability||The majority of text is size 12, but may be uncomfortable for some such as light grey text on grey background.|
The following table shows how well the product performs for people with disabilities, as listed in the Disabilities section.
Percentages do not indicate how much of a site is accessible. They indicate the average figure of test results relevant to each disability. Select a disability to see which tests are relevant to it.
|Specific Learning Differences (including Dyslexia)||80%|
|Blind and Severe Visual Impairments||75%|
|Cognitive Learning Disabilities||70%|
|Partially Sighted and Visual Acuity||67%|
|Deaf/Hard of Hearing||67%|